November, 2008

...now browsing by month

 

More bad ideas – ED’s to only see triage 1-3 patients? – What madness is this?

Saturday, November 29th, 2008

“EMERGENCY specialists have attacked as risky and dangerous plans to allow only patients assessed as being the most seriously ill to see them and to divert other patients to GP-led hospital clinics.

Under the plans — part of the 1100-page Garling report into NSW public hospitals released on Thursday — only patients judged as needing to be seen within 30 minutes, equivalent to triage categories 1, 2 and 3, would be treated by an emergency department specialist. ”

see newspaper article in The Australian today 29th Nov 2008.

That concept is an insult to the intelligence and value of opinions of those who work with these patients – ED physicians and nursing staff.

I have previously written a wiki article here which would show any reasonable person that the concept is not only ridiculous but downright dangerous!

Triage 4 and 5 patients in general ARE NOT GP type patients – although there is a subset who are GP type patients but most of these currently don’t wait to be seen anyway and don’t present a big problem. The problem is the majority of the triage 4 and 5 patients who are not GP type patients and who may leave without being seen at unwittingly considerable risk to themselves.

My wiki article has a reference to an ACEM published paper which CLEARLY EXPLAINS WHY TRIAGE 4 and 5 PATIENTS ARE NOT GP TYPE PATIENTS.

When are they going to listen?

Even if these patients were suitable for co-located GP clinics – in general, these clinics have failed to reduce ED burdens for a number of reasons – variable staffing and hours which risks creating a new culture for patients to use and then when capacity is reached these patients will flow to the ED; difficulty finding suitable GP’s to staff the clinics; hourly pay for the GP’s is usually 50% more than an ED physician would be paid; issues with continuity of care; relationships with competing GP clinics; etc.

Another example of tackling the wrong end of the problem – the PRIMARY PROBLEM with most ED’s is BED ACCESS BLOCK causing ED overcrowding NOT GP-type patients!

Solve bed access block and you won’t need to worry about building bigger ED’s, creating co-located GP clinics, etc.

Just improve bed capacity in hospitals and their management, as well as exit pathways THEN see what else needs to be done.

The Rudd government has offered an extra $500m which would fund 625 extra beds across Australia when the AMA has calculated there needs to be at least an extra 3750 beds to bring occupancy levels down to a safer 85% level. See The Australian 29th Nov 2008 article here. But then, perhaps we just can’t afford our health system anymore.

Addendum: more details of recommendations and links to relevant MJA articles on the Garling report can be found in this blog.

ED overcrowding => ambulance ramping => poor care

Monday, November 24th, 2008

Well, its pretty obvious really.

If governments force the hospital system to work without sufficient capacity, you get bed access block which results in ED overcrowding which means not only the ED patients and staff suffering adverse consequences, but it then flows on to the ambulance patients, ambulance officers and impairing the ability of the ambulance service to provide effective, timely care.

In Victoria, The Age newspaper on the 22nd Nov 2008 article ”
Patients wait in ambulances for care”
stated that:

    “more than 7700 patients waited in ambulances for more than 40 minutes before they could enter emergency departments for care. Another 54,900 waited between 15 minutes and 40 minutes to be transferred into the care of emergency department staff.

    The State Government’s own benchmark for a safe and timely transfer is 15 minutes.”

.

Ambulance ramping in ED corridors is a serious risk – not only to the delay in medical assessment and treatment this causes (the article quotes a totally unacceptable situation when a “code-one” patient with heart problems waited 25 minutes to enter Frankston Hospital), but potentially prevents access to even more urgent patients in near cardiac arrest arriving by ambulance as well as being a OH&S hazard and fire hazard with critical corridors being blocked.

It has been suggested that when ambulances are forced to ramp, the ambulance service should be placing that hospital on ambulance bypass even though the hospital and government want such actions minimised. This seems a logical step to take if the ambulance service is to maintain its excellent response times which currently are blowing out.

See here for letters in response to the above article including a letter by Dr Sarah Mansfield who questions the hospitals’ apparent prime motivation for productivity and cost reductions at the expense of quality patient care.

At times like these, NO public hospital should be making a profit at the expense of patient care!

Following these articles, is the related article in The Age today titled “Sick opt to walk out of hospitals – long delays in emergency wards” . This article gives some data on the extent of bed access block and its effect on the resulting numbers who choose not to wait to be seen.

Finally, a further article in today’s The Age titled “Fed-up paramedics skip tough shifts” demonstrates that although we know life is increasingly stressful for ED staff, the same applies to the ambulance officers.

Interestingly, many of our excellent ED nursing staff have left the stressors of the ED to become ambulance paramedics – perhaps it is now a case of jumping out of the frypan into the fire.

Unless the crisis is addressed soon, much valued, experienced staff will leave both systems and worse, will discourage recruitment of new staff which will further exacerbate the crisis.

And, as we all know, it’s not just in Victoria – Adelaide Now reports on the bed access crisis in Adelaide’s QEH on 22nd Nov 2008.

The question is… to what extent will the Rudd Government take at this weeks COAG meeting to address the grossly inadequate funding for Federal and State health services – see ABC News – “Australia can’t afford to sideline health reform”.

Junior doctors, long hours, stress and suicide

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008

The Age published an article “In critical care” today which describes the sad situation of the stresses many junior doctors still face in our hospital system, and perhaps worse, how this adversely impacts patient care and perhaps further contributes to bed access block.

Fortunately, junior doctors are generally well supported during their emergency medicine rotations as they generally have shifts 10hrs at most and usually work 38hrs/wk plus 5 hrs paid training time for ED trainee registrars.

Of course, even ED registrar trainees don’t get off lightly – when they finish work they still have very demanding study schedules required to pass the examination process which often makes it hard for them to maintain their social supports and find time for fun and relaxation.

ED junior doctors are generally well supervised in the accredited training hospitals although they are often exposed to stress during night shifts which can be extreme, particularly in hospitals with significant over-crowding and bed access block.

In these situations, the registrars may be handed over 20-30 patients to manage overnight who are waiting for inpatient beds whilst still having to address a full waiting room at 11pm and see new arrivals including ambulance emergencies, and supervise their HMO’s.

Such enormous stresses on the night ED doctors must be addressed as a priority – not just for patient care but for the health of our junior doctors and to give them hope that staying in the public hospital system will be a worthwhile endeavour.

I believe it is time we looked critically at patient numbers overnight in the ED – perhaps we should create a new KPI based on 11pm patients awaiting beds or total ED patient occupancy at 11pm?

But then again…. few non-clinicians seem to be worrying too much about not meeting existing KPIs.

see also:

A parliamentary inquiry into Victorian hospitals?

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008

Seems it’s not only the Queensland Govt apparently lacking transparency amidst a hospital system in crisis.

The Victorian State Opposition is wanting some answers too – see the Geelong Advertiser article on 18th Nov 2008.

and transcript of ABC broadcast 14th Nov 2008 with Vic. Health Minister, AMA and doctors relating to the Vic. AMA doctor blog

Work with Antarctic Division – vacant post 9 months Macquarie Island from Feb 2009

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

If you are interested in remote medicine, there is a vacant position for a doctor for Winter on Macquarie Island leaving Feb 2009.

You will need to be able to do closed reductions of common fractures (eg. Bier’s block), able to perform an emergency appendicectomy, and you will be given dental training prior to leaving.

See Ozemedicine wiki for more details.

Gimme some truth – is access block in Queensland really getting better?

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

Queensland opposition says bed access block in Queensland ED’s is getting worse.

Queensland health minister’s response is quoted in the ABC online as saying:

“waiting times increased because of the winter flu season”, and,
“the figures are better than for the same period last year”, and,
“That’s the true comparison. So things are not getting worse in relation to access block with emergency departments. When you do the true comparison in fact they’re gradually and modestly getting better.”

Now, given that Victoria’s flu season this year was much milder than last year, and yet Victoria’s bed access is getting worse, I was a bit puzzled by the conflicting statements in the report.

Is it just a case of spin doctoring so the government saves face or are Queenslanders really tackling the problem and improving bed access block?

I went to the Queensland Health website to hopefully find some answers….but alas, for the life of me, I couldn’t find any relevant data… so much for transparency in a democratic world.

If anyone happens to find relevant data, I would love to know.

Here are the main government performance data links:

main page for performance data.

There are lots of reports on numbers of patients but not much on performance KPI’s, although they do have a nice daily updated bypass and bed access block numbers for each hospital here