food_impaction
Table of Contents
food bolus impaction in adults
ee also:
Introduction
- impacted food bolus in the oesophagus usually occurs in adults with an underlying condition such as:
- eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) - this is thought to be the cause in around half the patients especially if there is a PH of asthma or hay fever
- pre-existing oesophageal stricture
- Schatzki's ring
- diverticula
- webs or rings
- achalasia
- tumours
- rarely may occur following tablet ingestion such as with body packing for concealment of substances being transported illegally
Sites of physiologic narrowing of the oesophagus
- upper oesophageal sphincter
- the aortic arch level
- at the diaphragmatic hiatus
Mx in ED
- indications for referral for emergent endoscopy
- endoscopy should be considered within 2 hours (and by 12hrs at the latest) if either:
- complete oesophageal obstruction as indicated by drooling and inability to swallow fluids partly as pulmonary aspiration is a high risk
- sharp pointed objects
- button battery ingestions
- endoscopy should be considered within 24 hours if either:
- foreign body in oesophagus (not sharp and not a button battery)
- sharp pointed objects in stomach or duodenum
- objects > 5cm in length
- magnets
- endoscopy should be considered within 72 hours if either:
- blunt objects > 2cm in stomach
- other batteries in stomach > 24hrs
- if there is severe pain or haematemesis (more than just a small amount of blood from a Mallory-Weiss tear)
- this may suggest oesophageal perforation or rupture (mild pain is to be expected with oesophageal spasm due to the food bolus, but severe pain is more concerning):
- CXR to look for pneumomediastinum
- consider CT chest
- discuss with gastroenterology ASAP
- otherwise, if there is incomplete oesophageal obstruction
- the far majority will pass without gastroscopic intervention
- NB. some patients may have persistent discomfort (odynophagia) for several hours after passing an impacted food bolus
- if food is likely to contain bone then a CXR may help to identify it
- expectant management is reasonable for most patients
- drinking carbonated drink such as cola has been used in the past but studies have failed to show consistent benefit over placebo
- does not seem to cause any severe adverse effects although 1/5th complain of discomfort from it
- 0.5-1mg IV glucagon can be tried to reduce oesophageal spasm but again, effectiveness is not proven, however it seems otherwise safe
- orally ingested 0.4mg sublingual GTN followed by water has also been used 1) but there are apparently no studies to show efficacy and it may cause syncope if patient is dehydrated or the chest pain is actually a RV infarct
food_impaction.txt · Last modified: 2024/05/28 06:31 by gary1